Category: Bible Knowledge

Date published: 22-03-2016 Easter Sunday is only a few days away, and it’s a great time to remember once again the power of the resurrection of Jesus Christ in a way that will affect the rest of our lives. That’s not to say that we shouldn’t live everyday with the message of the cross in our minds, but this season can be a wonderful time to focus on Jesus’s death, burial and resurrection. Holy Week isn’t just a time for more vacations and outings. It’s also a time to reflect more on what God’s redemptive work means to us. But is the message of Christ’s resurrection really true? 1 Corinthians 15:14 tells us, “And if Christ has not been raised, then our preaching is in vain and your faith is in vain.” The resurrection is the stamp that seals our victory in Jesus’s name. So what is our assurance that Jesus indeed rose from the dead? Here are five pieces of evidence that assure as that Jesus is indeed risen. 1. Matching accounts in the Gospels Not all accounts in Matthew, Mark, Luke and John are identical. Some numbers are off and some parables are told a little differently, but one thing that all accounts agree on is that Jesus rose from the dead three days after he was buried. Matthew and John are both direct accounts written about personal experiences with a resurrected Jesus. Mark is a reliable, first-hand relay of experiences Peter had with Jesus as Mark worked most closely with him. Luke is also a credible account from a physician who would rather look at facts and numbers than tall tales. 2. Empty tomb One thing is for sure — Jesus’s tomb is empty until this day. There have been many failed archaeological studies that claimed to have found Jesus’s remains, but there is not one that has proven to be at all reliable. Then there is the account written of an execution, signed by Pontius Pilate, of an innocent man named Yeshua on the request of Jewish people. So if Jesus is really dead, why hasn’t a body been found? 3. Paul’s transformational account Acts 9 tells the account of Saul’s conversation to Paul. In Acts 9:5, an exchange is made, “And he said, ‘Who are you, Lord?’ And he said, ‘I am Jesus, whom you are persecuting.’” If Jesus was truly dead then who appeared to Paul on the road to Damascus? 4. Multiple testimonies Aside from the testimonies of the four authors of the Gospels, there are numerous others that proclaim the resurrection of Jesus. There’s the account of the women visitors, of a doubting Thomas who later believed, and dozens of other disciples and followers who claimed to have interacted with Jesus. 5. Martyrdom of apostles While anyone can discount a large group of Jesus’s followers as liars who made the story of Jesus’s resurrection up, it’s hard to imagine how all of them would succumb to a painful martyr’s death for the sake of a “lie.” Not one person gave up on the message of a resurrected Jesus, which can only mean one thing — they believed He was alive because He is alive.

That the great divines (Bible Scholars) of the past have noted that one in twenty five verses in the New Testament have some engagement with the Second Coming of Jesus Christ and associated themes, it should come as no surprise to anyone that this subject (Eschatology) would create some controversy. This has interested me over my 39 years in ministry, and when all the various theories of the Second Coming of Jesus Christ have been assessed, there are three essential ingredients to the discussion that should be considered foremost. First, the Scriptures are replete with a clear understanding that Jesus Christ will return. There will be a Second Coming of Jesus Christ. He rose from the dead and He is coming again. Moreover, it should come as no surprise, that this is recognised only by the followers of Christ. In other words, the vast majority of the world’s population is simply unaware that the Scriptures speak of this. Second, not all followers of Christ are as conversant with the Scriptures as others. There has been a limited number of Bible lovers over the centuries who have carefully studied the ‘like’ passages of the Second Coming of Jesus Christ and have tried to bring some resolution to the subject. Thirdly, as these passionate ‘Second Coming of Jesus Christ’ Bible lovers have put their energies into this quest over the centuries, there have emerged two very broad schools of thought, and like most things of this nature, there are variations in each broad school. One of these two broad schools demonstrate a theology of the Second Coming of Jesus Christ that says, there will be a decisive time when history as we know will come to and end. It is instantaneously precipitated by the Second Coming of Jesus Christ. The other school The other broad school on the Second Coming of Jesus Christ demonstrates a theology that witnesses the end of the Church Age which leads into a final time period taking into account Scriptures that speak of ‘one taken, another left’, of such ‘tribulation’ the world has never thought possible, an ‘Armageddon’, armies of ‘two hundred million’, blood up to the ‘horses bridle’, and much more besides. In other words, the first group takes a view that the Bible’s descriptiveness of the Second Coming of Jesus Christ necessarily needs to be apocalyptic in order to even begin to fathom the unfathomable. The second group take a view that the Bible wasn’t written so no one could understand it, rather the very basis of the Reformation was that ordinary men and women could read and understand it. Moreover as the Second Coming of Jesus Christ takes such centre stage in the New Testament, any obscurity on such matters seems ludicrous. So, can there be a case for ‘agreeing to disagree’ on the theological outworking on the Second Coming of Jesus Christ or is there something more, some other ingredient, that might be taken into consideration in this matter? A central focus of Jesus’ teaching was the Kingdom of God. The central focus of the Apostle Paul’s and the Epistles teaching was the theology of the Cross, which helps us understand why we need to receive Christ as our Lord and becomes His followers. In other words, evangelism is a central focus. The great divines had no trouble in picking up this theme, and in my own life time, that where a descriptive expression of the Second Coming of Jesus Christ is lucid and passionate, what follows for many individuals is an unmistakable desire to repent and become a follower of Jesus. In other words, when the Second Coming of Jesus Christ is preached in such manner, the Holy Spirit strangely prompts the hearts of the hearers. I have been a witness to this over my 64 years, as have innumerable others. When the Second Coming of Jesus Christ is preached in a clear and descriptive manner, so the Holy Spirit somehow is able to minister within many of the lives of the hearers. To this, I am a testimony and an eye witness

At a time when Christians all over the world are openly and unapologetically making it clear that they accept Jesus as their saviour, we’re also reminded of how one of Jesus’ followers denied him just before his death. During yesterday’s Palm Sunday Masses and church services, congregations would have been retold the story of the Passion, which includes Jesus foretelling that Peter would deny him three times before the rooster crowed (Luke 22:36). For Christians who are committed to their faith and actively taking part in Holy Week, at this moment, the thought of denying Christ would likely result in a reaction very similar to Peter’s initial response to Jesus – a firm disbelief that they would ever do it (Matthew 26:35). But the reality is, even if we feel we have a strong faith, there can be times when we indirectly deny Jesus. Last week, I was in a bar and the topic of Christianity came up and I was asked if I was a Christian. I answered yes without hesitation. There’s a high probability that we’ll respond in the same way when questions about our faith are asked this directly. But denying Christ can be a lot more complex than Peter’s example, and the circumstances of the denial can occur in a much more veiled way than mine. Not talking about your faith. We talk about the things we love, that excite us and that mean a lot to us – our faith should be no different. Jesus told his disciples, “Whoever acknowledges me before others, I will also acknowledge before my Father in heaven. But whoever disowns me before others, I will disown before my Father in heaven,” (Matthew 10:32-33). Just because we might have never vocally renounced our beliefs, doesn’t mean that we’ve never denied Jesus. Not speaking out can be just as much a form of denial. Not defending or believing elements of your faith because you’re afraid of people’s reactions. When we’re put in a position where we have to defend certain controversial elements of our faith, a refusal to do so can be a form of indirect denial. Peter denied Jesus because he was afraid to be associated with him at a time when Jesus was in danger and close to death. He was afraid of what people might have said about him or done to him if he admitted that he was one of Jesus’ disciples. Just like Peter, we can also avoid associating ourselves with particular aspects of our faith in situations where we’re faced with unfavourable consequences. Do you really believe in the Holy Spirit? Do you really believe in the virgin birth? It’s a lot easier to refute particular elements but doing so leads us to deny Christ. Denying Christ through our acts. Our lives should reflect the impact Jesus has had on them. This doesn’t mean that everything is perfect or that we need to be, but it does mean that our actions should imitate his. Essentially, we need to walk the walk as well as talk the talk. “They claim to know God, but by their actions they deny him. They are detestable, disobedient and unfit for doing anything good,” (Titus 1:16). Do your actions match up with Jesus’ teaching? Do you love your neighbour? If our outward behaviour is the complete polar opposite to how Jesus lived and how he taught his followers to live, then we’re denying him through our behaviour. Our faith can recover from the instances in which we fail to acknowledge Christ, just as Peter’s did. But we need to identify what constitutes indirect denial if we have any hope of avoiding it in future.